Proof of Life
“If this suggestion of person hood is established,…… the fetus’ right to life is then guaranteed specifically by the [14th] Amendment.” (Blackmun;Row vs. Wade pg. 179 Reports ref. to Texas statute on abortion.)
NOTE: The initial and fundamental presumption of all law is that life is present and that it belongs to a human being i.e. a person. This is so because the law is only for the living and the only respondents are persons. Therefore the presumption.
The Constitution requires only three things pertinent to the abortion issue. They are:
- Presence of life. (when life begins is irrelevant.)
- Personage, ie. species.
- If the above are established in the affirmative then due process is required before you can kill it.
Proof of Life:
The living ultimately become the nonliving.
The nonliving never become the living.
Therefore life is either present or it’s not and life never arises spontaneously.
It follows that life must be present from the point of conception until death occurs.
If life is not present at conception it can never be present at any point subsequent to conception because it cannot arise spontaneously.
Therefore Life begets only Life.
Proof of Species.
All living things are a product of a reproductive process, either sexual or asexual.
The reproduction of anything, be it specie of coin in your pocket, a fender for your car, a community of identical houses and so-on, requires a constant template of some type to determine what specie of thing will be reproduced. That template may be a die, a mold, a set of plans or instructions, a digital program etc. and so-on. Among the living that template is genetics. Species among the living is a property of genetics and nothing else.
Therefore if the living being in question is of human origin and human destiny it can only be regarded as human. If it is human two things become immediately apparent.
First, if it is human, it is a member of a species. If it is a member of a species its being constitutes an entity of life rather than an undifferentiated or differentiated tissue of life such as a skin cell.
Second, if its specie is human, it enjoys the condition of personage.
This truth is irrefutable within the common meaning of our common language. The product of human procreation is a living human entity and therefor a person. The law and the Constitution do not permit spurious conjecture or supposition.
The Agenda of the Court:
The above constitute empirical evidence of forensic quality that was and is within immediate and easy reach of the Court but ignored. The response of the Chief Justice who authored Roe vs Wade to a direct question posed by a journalist from the Chicago Tribune following his retirement from the bench betrays his violation of duty and the agenda of the Court.
“It was the step that had to be taken as we go down the road toward the full emancipation of women.” (Blackmun, 4/7/1994 Chicago Tribune.
It should be clear that the sole purpose of the decision was not to preserve the privacy of the pregnant female, but to emancipate her from the responsibility for the consequences of her sexual activity.
Exception:
Note: As stated by the Court “the law deals in the known, not the unknown”, and therefore the knowable rather than the unknowable. The fertilized ovum is therefore not protected by law until it attaches to the womb and gestation begins such as its forced removal would cause its death. This is an unknowable circumstance. This means that all current methods of contraception that prevent the zygote from attaching to the uterine wall such that gestation can begin are protected by law. The female has the right to prevent pregnancy, but not to abort a pregnancy causing the death of the individual that resides within her without due process. The same applies to those who perform such procedures. Circumstances resulting in development of the fetus, such as ectopic pregnancies, etc. which threaten the life of the mother or are a result of the rape of a minor or forced submission but not limited to these could be expedited through an administrative review board. This is for the states to decide so long as due process is observed.
Help promote this idea. Embarrass the Supreme Court with their own errors. Roe vs. Wade is vulnerable as a matter of law. The Court holds forth no body of empirical evidence of forensic quality that support the assumptions, assertions and conclusions reached by Blackmun and the Court in Roe. It is based entirely on meager precedents and subjective assumptions. See The Servants of Expediency and Ockham’s Razor and Roe vs. Wade. Visit our promotional products on www.Zazzle.com/thebushwhacker . T-shirts, mugs and bumper stickers are available. Life begets only Life.
©theBushwhacker .com
One Response to “Proof of Life”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
November 17th, 2011 at 10:41 pm
Another Day…
[...]we prefer to honor other internet sites around the web, even though they aren’t related to us, by linking to them. Beneath are some sites really worth checking out[...]…